The east coast of Northeast Brazil (ENEB) has experienced an increase in extreme precipitation events in recent years because of climate change caused by human activities. ENEB is characterized by the influence of several synoptic-scale systems throughout the year that contribute to the development of extreme precipitation events, emphasizing that the region needs actions to increase its capacity to predict the threat of natural hazards with significant material and human losses. Several studies have shown an increase in the frequency and intensity of these events, accenting the growing importance of accurate numerical weather prediction models has become increasingly critical in aiding decision-makers and governments to plan effective actions that can prevent or mitigate catastrophic consequences. In the present study, one extreme precipitation event developed over the Alagoas state (located at the ENEB) occurred in July 01, 2022 was analyzed. The accumulated rainfall of 185 mm/day was recorded, triggering landslides, floods and river overflows in different cities. The main objective of this study was to apply the Model for Prediction Across Scales Atmosphere (MPAS) model with a variable-resolution mesh to perform the simulation for both extreme precipitation events. A 60-3 km variable resolution mesh with refinement centered on the city of Maceió was configured. The high resolution (3 km) can resolve the known finer-scale mechanisms responsible for cloud formation in the region. Numerical simulations were driven by ERA5 reanalysis to investigate sensitivity to initial conditions. Gridded data from MERGE/CPTEC (0.1°) for hourly accumulated precipitation were used to evaluate the simulated hourly accumulated precipitation. Through the results obtained in the analysis, it was possible to observe a significant variation in the correlations between MPAS and MERGE, with values above 0.67 for some cities affected by heavy rainfall (Quebrangulo, Paulo Jacinto, and Cajueiro), indicating that the model was able to track the temporal variability in these cities. On the other hand, in cities where lower correlations were observed, there might have been some displacement of the rain relative to the observed MERGE data. The BIAS analysis indicated that MPAS tends to underestimate precipitation at all evaluated points, with the highest intensities occurring in locations with higher correlations, suggesting that the model captured the position of the rainfall well but did not accurately represent the volumes. This becomes evident when evaluating the RMSE, MAE, and BIAS, where the values were more pronounced in locations with higher rainfall volumes, reaching up to 7.78 mm/h. These results provide important information into the performance of MPAS, highlighting the need for an extended evaluation with other physical parameterizations and model configurations.
Redes Sociais